Author Topic: Moving the PET/CBM II forums  (Read 1192 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Blacklord

  • Administrator
  • PET user
  • *****
  • Posts: 64
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia
  • Activity:
    0.2%
  • Country: au
  • Reputation: 779
  • Gender: Male
  • With us since: 04/06/2006
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • View Profile
    • http://www.commodore128.org
Moving the PET/CBM II forums
« on: January 24, 2009, 01:39 AM »
This weekend I'll be creating the PET/CBM II forums within the structure of the C128 forums - makes sense as all the users are the same on both boards anyway :)

What I won't be doing is moving the messages - I'll leave a link in place for the old PET forums but they will be read only.

I hope this doesn't inconvenience anyone too much!

Lance

Offline Andrew Wiskow

  • 128D user
  • *******
  • Posts: 1089
  • Age: 38
  • Location: San Diego, California, USA
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 24
  • Gender: Male
  • With us since: 08/02/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • View Profile
    • Cottonwood BBS Informational Website
Re: Moving the PET/CBM II forums
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2009, 05:40 AM »
Given that the forum already includes areas for other Commodore machines, rather than calling it "Commodore 128 (& PET) Alive!", wouldn't it make more sense just to call it "Commodore Alive!"??

Offline Blacklord

  • Administrator
  • PET user
  • *****
  • Posts: 64
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia
  • Activity:
    0.2%
  • Country: au
  • Reputation: 779
  • Gender: Male
  • With us since: 04/06/2006
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • View Profile
    • http://www.commodore128.org
Re: Moving the PET/CBM II forums
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2009, 11:11 AM »
Given that the forum already includes areas for other Commodore machines, rather than calling it "Commodore 128 (& PET) Alive!", wouldn't it make more sense just to call it "Commodore Alive!"??

Maybe - but the focus is on these two "forgotten by the rest of the community" machines.

The signal to noise ratio here is very, very low, if we open up to all CBM machines to a greater degree we'd probably end up with some of the factionalism & infighting that exists elsewhere.

However, I'm always open to suggestions from our little community (by that I mean the one here & not the wider CBM community) & will happily implement whatever you guys want - after all, I'm just the host - the party is for you guys :)

Lance

Offline Andrew Wiskow

  • 128D user
  • *******
  • Posts: 1089
  • Age: 38
  • Location: San Diego, California, USA
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 24
  • Gender: Male
  • With us since: 08/02/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • View Profile
    • Cottonwood BBS Informational Website
Re: Moving the PET/CBM II forums
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2009, 11:28 AM »
I'm all for keeping the signal to noise ratio low.  ;)

Offline airship

  • 128D user
  • *******
  • Posts: 1605
  • Age: 61
  • Location: Iowa, USA
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 113
  • Gender: Male
  • Former Editor, INFO Magazine
  • With us since: 28/07/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • View Profile
    • Atomic Airship
Re: Moving the PET/CBM II forums
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2009, 03:12 AM »
I vote for C128 purity. The C128 is my one true love.

If I want to listen in on the C64 buzz, I go over to Lemon64. Kim does a good job over there, and there's plenty of action. The S/N ratio is not as good as it is here, but that's to be expected.

As for PET, I never owned one (though I DID have an Ohio Scientific Challenger 1P, which was essentially a PET clone). The small amount of interest I have in them is strictly historical.

So, C128 all the way! Yeah!  :cool:
Serving up content-free posts on the Interwebs since 1983.
History of INFO Magazine

 



Back to top